Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding cancer clusters.

Michael J Thun1, Thomas Sinks

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.

CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians
|September 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discovery and fine-mapping of height loci via high-density imputation of GWASs in individuals of African ancestry.

American journal of human genetics·2021
Same author

Higher Lung Cancer Incidence in Young Women Than Young Men in the United States.

The New England journal of medicine·2018
Same author

Pooled analysis of active cigarette smoking and invasive breast cancer risk in 14 cohort studies.

International journal of epidemiology·2016
Same author

Smoking and mortality--beyond established causes.

The New England journal of medicine·2015
Same author

Additive interactions between susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association studies and breast cancer risk factors in the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium.

American journal of epidemiology·2014
Same author

Body mass index and risk of death in Asian Americans.

American journal of public health·2014
Same journal

Serious mental illness and cancer: A call to action for equitable care.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2026
Same journal

Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: From fatal to curable.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2026
Same journal

Data support longer recurrence-free survival with nivolumab than with ipilimumab for stage III or IV melanoma.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2026
Same journal

Study finds ovarian cancer survivors who are BRCA carriers have a relatively low risk of breast cancer.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2026
Same journal

Radiation therapy, cytogenetic prognostication, novel systemic chemotherapy, and patient perspective in an adult with choroidal melanoma.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2026
Same journal

Systemic amyloid light-chain amyloidosis beyond ANDROMEDA: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic updates.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2026
See all related articles

Investigating suspected cancer clusters requires careful review, as most are not statistically significant. Even confirmed clusters rarely identify a definitive cause due to chance or complex factors.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Environmental Health

Background:

  • State and local health departments receive over 1,000 inquiries annually regarding suspected cancer clusters.
  • Most inquiries (75%) are resolved via telephone, not requiring further investigation.
  • A smaller proportion necessitates detailed follow-up to verify case numbers, demographics, cancer types, and diagnostic dates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss available scientific tools and resources for investigating cancer clusters.
  • To provide a framework for understanding cancer clusters.
  • To offer a realistic perspective on the capabilities and limitations of cluster investigations.

Main Methods:

  • Initial screening of reported cases via telephone.
  • Detailed data collection on affected individuals (age, cancer type, diagnosis dates).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of observed cancer incidence with background rates using state tumor registries and statistical testing.

    • Main Results:

    • Formal statistical testing confirms excess cancer cases in 5% to 15% of investigated situations.
    • Chance remains a plausible explanation for many confirmed clusters.
    • Epidemiologic investigations seldom identify a definitive underlying cause.

    Conclusions:

    • While statistical methods can confirm excess cases, identifying the cause of most cancer clusters remains challenging.
    • Confirmed clusters are most often linked to rare cancers in specific occupational or medical settings with known exposures.
    • Understanding community expectations versus the scientific limitations of cancer cluster investigations is crucial.