Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity.

Jan Theeuwes1, Arthur F Kramer, Alan Kingstone

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.theeuwes@psy.vu.nl

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|September 21, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same author

Comparative Designs Reveal Preferences for Human-Generated Rather Than AI-Generated art.

Empirical studies of the arts·2026
Same author

Autistic Traits and Mind Wandering: A Correlational Study of Themes, Intentionality, and Temporal Focus.

Psychological reports·2026
Same author

The Impact of Face Masks on Social Perception Is Age-Dependent.

Psychological reports·2026
Same author

Sit, stand, and swivel: Posture affects visual exploration of panoramic scenes in virtual reality.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Mind wandering during five minutes of rest: Autistic traits, visual thought, and thinking about others.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

An irrelevant color singleton in a visual display captures attention, reducing the ability to detect targets. This effect is stronger when the distracting color singleton is near the target, impacting visual attention and sensory input.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Attention is crucial for processing visual information.
  • Visual search tasks often involve salient distractors.
  • Understanding attentional capture is key to visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how irrelevant color singletons affect spatial attention distribution.
  • To quantify the impact of attentional capture on target detectability.
  • To explore the relationship between singleton proximity and attentional modulation.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed visual search tasks with varying singleton conditions.
  • Target detectability was measured using signal detection theory (d').
  • The spatial relationship between target and irrelevant singleton was manipulated.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The presence of an irrelevant color singleton significantly modulated target detectability (d').
  • Target detectability decreased in the presence of a color singleton.
  • This reduction in detectability was most pronounced when the irrelevant singleton was spatially close to the target.

Conclusions:

  • Irrelevant salient stimuli can involuntarily capture visual attention.
  • Attentional capture by a singleton reduces sensory gain at the target location.
  • Spatial proximity between distractors and targets amplifies attentional interference.