Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
Published on: February 26, 2014
A comment on Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort's QMLE method for response time distributions
Paul L Speckman1, Jeffrey N Rouder
1University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
Abstract:
Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort (2002) have introduced a new, robust method of estimating response time distributions. Their method may have practical advantages over conventional maximum likelihood estimation. The basic idea is that the likelihood of parameters is maximized given a few quantiles from the data. We show that Heathcote et al.'s likelihood function is not correct and provide the appropriate correction. However, although our correction stands on firmer theoretical ground than Heathcote et al.'s, it appears to yield worse parameter estimates. This result further indicates that, at least for some distributions and situations, quantile maximum likelihood estimation may have better nonasymptotic properties than a more theoretically justified approach.
Related Concept Videos
Modified Boxplots
However, the box plot does not tell the reader about outliers - values that lie far from the center of the data. We can modify the standard box and whisker plot to identify the outliers and visualize the actual spread of the data in a sample.
Initially, we calculate the adjusted...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Cochran's Q Test

