Related Experiment Videos
Water uptake and release from iodine-containing bone cement
F Kjellson1, B Brudeli, I D McCarthy
1Department of Orthopaedics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. fred.kjellson@ort.lu.se
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A
|September 24, 2004
Summary
Iohexol and iodixanol in bone cement show distinct water uptake and release. Iohexol exhibits higher water uptake and release, impacting cement properties and long-term performance.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Polymer Chemistry
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is widely used in orthopedic surgery.
- Water-soluble contrast media are incorporated into bone cement for intraoperative imaging.
- Understanding the interaction between contrast media and PMMA cement is crucial for predicting cement behavior and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the water uptake and release characteristics of PMMA cement containing iohexol and iodixanol.
- To determine the diffusion coefficients of water in the cement formulations.
- To assess the long-term release profiles of the contrast media from the bone cement.
Main Methods:
- Water uptake and release studies were conducted on PMMA cement formulations.
- Diffusion coefficients were calculated based on water uptake curves following classic diffusion theory.
- Micro-computed tomography (microCT) was used to evaluate the cement integrity and radiolucent zones.
Main Results:
- Iohexol demonstrated the highest water uptake (3.7%), followed by iodixanol (2.3%) and Palacos R (1.9%).
- Iohexol exhibited the lowest diffusion coefficient, while Palacos R had the highest.
- Long-term release of iohexol from the bone cement exceeded 25 microg/mL, compared to over 10 microg/mL for iodixanol.
Conclusions:
- The water uptake and release of iohexol and iodixanol in PMMA cement follow diffusion principles.
- Iohexol shows significantly higher water uptake and release compared to iodixanol.
- The risk of developing an observable radiolucent zone around the cement is negligible, irrespective of the contrast agent used.