Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in acute myocardial infarction (CARESS in AMI)
Carlo Di Mario1, Leonardo Bolognese, Luc Maillard
1Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom. c.dimario@rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
Insights
This study compares conservative management versus immediate angioplasty for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients receiving abciximab and reteplase. It aims to determine the optimal reperfusion strategy for improved clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Many acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients lack immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) access.
- Thrombolysis is a common reperfusion therapy in such settings, but optimal follow-up strategies remain unclear.
- Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors like abciximab show benefit in angioplasty for AMI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of conservative management versus immediate angioplasty.
- To evaluate two strategies post-abciximab and half-dose reteplase for ST-elevation AMI.
- To determine if angioplasty can be postponed or skipped in select reperfused patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial (CARESS in AMI) in high-risk ST-elevation AMI patients.
- Patients received half-dose reteplase and full-dose abciximab.
- Randomization to conventional medical therapy (with rescue PTCA if needed) or immediate angioplasty.
Main Results:
- Seventy-four patients randomized as of March 10, 2004.
- Study results were anticipated in June 2005.
- Primary endpoint: 30-day incidence of mortality, reinfarction, and refractory ischemia.
Conclusions:
- The study will clarify if immediate angioplasty is essential for all patients receiving combined reperfusion therapy.
- It will assess if angioplasty can be deferred in patients with successful reperfusion.
- Findings may offer significant organizational advantages in AMI management.
Background:
Most patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are admitted to hospitals without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) facilities or are initially managed in a prehospital mobile unit. Thrombolysis remains the most readily available reperfusion treatment in those settings, but the optimal subsequent strategy in those patients is unclear. If a mechanical recanalization is likely to be performed in an emergency, it is probably desirable that the patient receives abciximab, the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist with the strongest evidence of benefit for angioplasty in AMI.
Objective:
The aim of this trial is to compare the effects on clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of 2 strategies after immediate treatment with abciximab and half-dose reteplase for ST-elevation AMI: to manage the patients conservatively (referring them for rescue PTCA only if needed) or to immediately send all patients for emergency coronary angioplasty.
Methods:
The Combined Abciximab RE-teplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS in AMI) is an open, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial conducted in patients with high-risk ST-segment elevation AMI treated within 12 hours from symptom onset in hospitals without PTCA facilities or in a prehospital mobile intensive care unit. Apart from contraindications to thrombolysis, the main exclusion criteria are age > or =75 years and a past history of CABG surgery or a percutaneous coronary intervention procedure involving the infarct-related artery. Enrollment will be performed in hospitals without PTCA facilities or directly in the ambulance if a dedicated system is in place for prehospital diagnosis and treatment of AMI. Patients will receive half-dose reteplase and full-dose abciximab and will subsequently be randomized to conventional medical therapy (with referral for emergency rescue PTCA allowed in selected cases) or emergency angioplasty. The primary end point is the 30-day combined incidence of mortality, reinfarction, and refractory ischemia. In order to obtain a 95% power (2-sided) to detect a 42% reduction in the primary end point, 900 patients are required in each arm of the study. Secondary end points include the 1-year composite end point of mortality, reinfarction, refractory ischemia, and hospital readmission because of heart failure; resource use at 30 days and 1 year; and the incidence of inhospital stroke and bleeding complications in the 2 groups.
Results:
Seventy-four patients have been randomized (as of March 10, 2004); results are expected in June 2005.
Conclusion:
This study will establish whether angioplasty must be started as soon as possible in all patients who receive combined pharmacologic reperfusion with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab and half-dose thrombolysis or whether it can be postponed or skipped in patients with signs of successful reperfusion, with obvious organizational advantages.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

