Related Experiment Videos
Quantum process tomography of the quantum Fourier transform.
Yaakov S Weinstein1, Timothy F Havel, Joseph Emerson
1Department of Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
The Journal of Chemical Physics
|September 28, 2004
Summary
Quantum process tomography on a three-qubit NMR quantum processor accurately modeled experimental errors. Analysis revealed coherent, incoherent, and decoherent error components impacting the quantum Fourier transform implementation.
Area of Science:
- Quantum Information Science
- Quantum Computing
- Experimental Quantum Physics
Background:
- Quantum process tomography (QPT) is essential for characterizing quantum operations.
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) quantum information processors offer a platform for implementing quantum algorithms.
- The quantum Fourier transform (QFT) is a key component in several quantum algorithms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To perform QPT on a three-qubit NMR quantum information processor.
- To analyze implementation errors of the quantum Fourier transform (QFT).
- To model and decompose errors into coherent, incoherent, and decoherent components.
Main Methods:
- Utilized quantum process tomography on a three-qubit NMR quantum information processor.
- Applied strongly modulating control fields for precise quantum operations.
- Analyzed experimental results using a detailed system-plus-apparatus model.
- Decomposed errors into coherent, incoherent, and decoherent components.
Main Results:
- Experimental QPT results were consistent with the detailed system model.
- The implemented QFT superoperator showed strong correlation with the theoretical expectation.
- Identified non-complete positivity, largely due to incoherent errors during the QPT procedure.
- Gate fidelity was 0.64, with a superoperator correlation of 0.79.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully modeled and analyzed errors in a three-qubit NMR QFT implementation.
- Incoherent errors significantly impacted the complete positivity of the quantum operation.
- Distinct error components can be identified by their spectral effects on the superoperator.
- Cumulative small errors in single-qubit gates explained most discrepancies with simulations.