Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Comparisons of hypertension-related costs from multinational clinical studies
C Daniel Mullins1, Mirko Sikirica, Viran Seneviratne
1University of Maryland Center on Drugs and Public Policy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. dmullins@rx.umaryland.edu
Insights
This study compares hypertension care costs across eight countries, finding significant variations. While US costs are often highest, specific treatments like heart failure in France and renal failure in Germany/UK can be more expensive.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Cardiovascular Disease Management
- International Healthcare Systems
Background:
- Hypertension management involves substantial hospital and ambulatory care costs.
- Multinational comparisons are crucial for understanding global healthcare expenditures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and compare individual cost components for hypertensive patient care across eight high-income countries.
- To analyze the impact of cross-country cost variations on health economic analyses.
Main Methods:
- Classified hypertension-related costs by major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, renal failure).
- Utilized Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) codes for cross-country cost comparisons.
- Adjusted costs using Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) and inflation-adjusted US dollars (year 2000).
Main Results:
- Significant variation exists in hypertension-related costs among the eight studied countries.
- The US generally exhibits higher costs, but exceptions include heart failure in France and renal failure (non-transplant) in Germany and the UK.
- Cost data comparability is a key challenge in multinational health economic evaluations.
Conclusions:
- Cross-country cost variations impact multinational cost analyses and require careful consideration.
- Standardized cost estimates in clinical trials may not fully capture national cost differences.
- This study provides a framework for identifying comparable cost data and problem areas in multinational health economic research, applicable beyond hypertension.
Background:
This study identifies and compares the individual cost components of hospital and ambulatory services that manage the care of hypertensive patients in eight countries: the US, the UK, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, Canada and Australia.
Methods:
Hypertension-related costs are classified according to four major cardiovascular events: (i) acute myocardial infarction; (ii) congestive heart failure; (iii) stroke; and (iv) renal failure, which was subdivided into renal failure treated by dialysis and renal failure treated by kidney transplantation. To make cross-country costs comparisons, we used the DRG codes used in the US and DRG-like codes from each country. US cost information was obtained from hypertension data available from the literature and health economics researchers. For costs in other countries, we consulted with national health economics experts in each country, used analyses by the Research Triangle Institute, and performed Medline and international literature searches. When available, we obtained information from the countries' public and private nationally representative data sources. For cross-country currency adjustments, all currencies were converted using the Purchasing Power Parities from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, and then converted into inflation-adjusted year 2000 US dollars.
Results:
There exists considerable variation in hypertension-related costs from multinational clinical studies. This study documents that costs are generally higher in the US than in other countries; however, this is not always true. In particular, costs of treating heart failure in France and the costs of renal failure without transplantation in Germany and the UK are relatively high.
Discussion:
While analysing multinational hypertensive cost data, this study also addresses the impact of cross-country cost variations on cost analyses. During the last decade, drug-development researchers have drawn extensively upon multinational trials to resolve enrollment problems and drug-registration issues. At the same time, formulary decision-makers are increasingly demanding multinational cost-effectiveness analyses of the clinical differences found between drug-treatment regimens. Since these data are typically not captured by randomised clinical trials, standard cost estimates must be applied to the clinical trials' resource data, although such standardised calculations do not necessarily account for clinical and cost variations between countries.
Conclusion:
This paper serves as an instrument for identifying which national and event cost data are comparable for analysis as well as highlighting specific problem areas for cost data integration. Although the study focuses on hypertension-related costs, its results may provide insight for multinational cost comparisons of other diseases where similar hospitalisation costs may be analysed.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

