Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are quantitative methods sufficient to show why wards react differently to computer-based nursing documentation?

Elske Ammenwerth1, Ulrich Mansmann, Cornelia Mahler

  • 1University for Health Informatics and Technology Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|October 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biases in Healthcare AI and Their Impact on Patient Empowerment: A Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Logic Models on Health Information Technology: First Insights from a Cross-Disciplinary Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Cross-Institutional Data Harmonization for AI in Nursing Care Using the OMOP CDM.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

From Evidence to Implementation: Logic Modelling for Digital Nursing Innovation.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Semantic Mapping of German Nursing Diagnoses in SNOMED CT: Risks and Challenges.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Engaging Citizens in Digital Health: A Participatory Exploration of Attitudes Toward Austria's ELGA.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

A GenAI Pipeline for Violinist Kinematic Data Management.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

AMAL-For-Qatar: A Comprehensive AI Ecosystem for Fetal Ultrasound Analysis - Project Overview and Achievements.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Treatment-Aware Multimodal AI for Dermatology: A Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Predicting Postpartum Depression Using Imbalance-Aware Machine Learning.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Validation of Deep-Learning Models for Autosegmentation of Brain Metastases.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Delay-Dependent Gating in Modular RNNs.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
See all related articles

Implementing computer-based nursing documentation systems requires understanding ward-specific success factors. A two-year study found varied reactions, highlighting the need for qualitative methods to fully evaluate these information systems.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Nursing Information Systems
  • Information System Evaluation

Background:

  • Computer-based nursing documentation systems are increasingly adopted in hospitals.
  • Evaluating these systems often relies on quantitative methods that may not capture nuanced success factors.
  • Understanding diverse reactions to system implementation is crucial for successful adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the effects of a computer-based nursing documentation system over two years.
  • To explore the reasons behind differential ward reactions to the implemented system.
  • To demonstrate the complementary value of qualitative methods in information system evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a computer-based nursing documentation system across four hospital wards.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two-year systematic evaluation including quantitative analysis of effects.
  • Discussion of quantitative results and exploration of differences using qualitative insights.

    • Main Results:

    • Quantitative analysis revealed significant differences in how wards responded to the documentation system.
    • The study identified varied reactions, indicating that a one-size-fits-all approach to implementation is insufficient.
    • Initial quantitative findings necessitated further qualitative exploration to understand underlying causes.

    Conclusions:

    • Quantitative methods alone are insufficient to fully understand the success factors of computer-based nursing documentation systems.
    • Qualitative methods are essential for uncovering both expected and unexpected reasons for differing ward responses.
    • A mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of information system implementation and success.