Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perceiving object motion using vision and touch.

Thomas W James1, Randolph Blake

  • 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. tom.james@vanderbilt.edu

Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
|October 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensorimotor Mechanisms of Decisions and Actions.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

A reevaluation of the visual phantom illusion and its impact on the motion aftereffect.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Are illusory visual phantoms seen by the motion system: Investigations utilizing the motion aftereffect.

Research square·2025
Same author

Approach-avoidance conflict recruits lateral frontoparietal and cinguloinsular networks in a predator-prey game setting.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2025
Same author

Self-supervised learning of scale-invariant neural representations of space and time.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2025
Same author

A new 'CFS tracking' paradigm reveals uniform suppression depth regardless of target complexity or salience.

eLife·2024
Same journal

The role of sleep in strengthening face learning and memory consolidation: A systematic review.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

How the brain represents a romantic partner: Dissociable roles of the nucleus accumbens and anterior insula.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Predictive processing in time perception: Assessing prediction error minimization in the sub-second range.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Fronto-Parietal EEG asymmetry interactions predict negative attention bias: A secondary data analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: The neural basis of cost-benefit trade-offs in effort investment: a quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Tactile input partially disambiguates ambiguous visual motion perception. Touching a tangible sphere biased visual motion direction, showing sensory priming but not overriding visual ambiguity, leading to potential sensory conflict.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Bistable visual motion perception presents ambiguous directional information.
  • Previous research indicated partial disambiguation of visual motion by tactile input.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To further investigate the influence of tactile input on ambiguous visual motion perception.
  • To explore the effects of a more potent visuotactile stimulus on motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Monocular viewing of a rotating tangible wire-frame sphere (TS).
  • Tactile stimulation of the TS during visual perception.
  • Analysis of simultaneous and subsequent visual motion perception biases.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tactile stimulation of the TS biased visual motion perception in the direction of touch (sensory priming).
  • Tactile input did not override the ambiguous visual percept, leading to periods of sensory conflict.
  • Visual and tactile motion percepts remained independent during extreme conflict.

Conclusions:

  • Visuotactile integration can occur, but extreme conflict leads to independent processing.
  • Tactile input acts as a facilitator or primer for visual motion perception rather than an adapter or interferer.
  • Sensory conflict arises when visual and tactile motion percepts are incongruent.