Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing.

Michael Tombu1, Pierre Jolicoeur

  • 1York University, Centre for Vision Research, Toronto, ON, Canada. mtombu@cs.yorku.ca

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|October 7, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are aggressive people able to integrate mitigating information into their hostile intent attribution? An ERP study.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

The influence of social knowledge structures on hostile attribution bias in aggressive and nonaggressive individuals: An ERP study.

Neuropsychologia·2024
Same author

Theta oscillations linked to auditory informativeness and context disambiguation.

Neuroreport·2024
Same author

Pain reflects the informational value of nociceptive inputs.

Pain·2024
Same author

Difficulty suppressing visual distraction while dual tasking.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Task-irrelevant filler items alter the dynamics of electrical brain activity during visual search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2022
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Previous research on dual-tasking may be flawed. Our experiments minimized confounding factors, revealing significant dual-task interference, supporting a central capacity limitation in human information processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • Previous claims of perfect time-sharing in dual-task situations are common.
  • Confounding variables may have obscured true dual-task interference in prior studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-examine dual-task performance by minimizing confounding effects.
  • To investigate the presence and extent of dual-task interference.
  • To evaluate the central capacity limitation hypothesis versus alternative explanations.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were designed to isolate and reduce confounding variables.
  • Participants performed tasks under conditions minimizing previously identified interference factors.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistically significant dual-task interference was observed.
  • The results contradict claims of virtually perfect time-sharing.
  • Evidence supports a structural central capacity limitation in human processing.

    • Conclusions:

    • Dual-task interference is a robust phenomenon.
    • The findings challenge the notion that dual-task interference can be eliminated by meeting specific conditions.
    • Human information processing appears constrained by a central capacity limit.