Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Age differences in estimating arrival-time.

Nicolas Benguigui1, Michael Broderick, Hubert Ripoll

  • 1Centre de Recherches en Sciences du Sport, Université Paris-Sud(11), UFR STAPS, Bâtiment 335, 91405 ORSAY Cedex, France. nicolas.benguigui@staps.u-psud.fr

Neuroscience Letters
|October 7, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sleep deprivation: sensitivity comparison between a visuomotor tracking task and the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT).

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Risk factors affecting tissue expander use and nipple areolar complex sparing in Goldilocks mastectomy.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Improving women's team performance on corners through video training and ball trajectory anticipation.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Anticipation training for expert tennis players when facing a specific player.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Using 3D immersive virtual reality interactive tasks for upper limb rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.

Developmental neurorehabilitation·2024
Same author

Distinct Longitudinal Changes in EEG Measures Reflecting Functional Network Disruption in ALS Cognitive Phenotypes.

Brain topography·2024
Same journal

Dynorphinergic neuroadaptations in the islands of Calleja: implications for alcohol use disorder.

Neuroscience letters·2026
Same journal

Differential vulnerability of cochlear nuclei to Lmx1 deficiency: abnormal patterning and implications for auditory circuitry.

Neuroscience letters·2026
Same journal

Role of nNOS/sGC pathway in the insular cortex in control of cardiovascular, autonomic and corticosterone responses to restraint stress in rats.

Neuroscience letters·2026
Same journal

Jak1 inhibition reduces acute allodynia induced by specific upstream cytokines in rats: implications for the onset of Jak1 pain modulation.

Neuroscience letters·2026
Same journal

Glucocorticoids-induced depressive-like behaviors in mice: oral ingestion of corticosterone or hydrocortisone - A comparative study.

Neuroscience letters·2026
Same journal

Data-driven clustering of prefrontal activation identifies functional phenotypes under prioritized dual-task walking conditions in Parkinson's disease.

Neuroscience letters·2026
See all related articles

Children aged 7 can predict moving objects like adults, but accuracy improves significantly between ages 7 and 10. This indicates children

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Developmental psychology
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • Understanding how humans predict motion is crucial for cognitive and developmental psychology.
  • Investigating age-related differences in motion extrapolation provides insights into developing predictive abilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the accuracy of occluded trajectory extrapolation across different age groups.
  • To determine how observer age influences the ability to predict the motion of occluded objects.

Main Methods:

  • A prediction-motion task was administered to adults and children (7, 10, and 13 years old).
  • Participants judged the arrival time of a stimulus after its trajectory was occluded.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Children as young as 7 employed similar extrapolation strategies to adults.
  • Response accuracy significantly improved for occlusion durations of 400 ms or longer.
  • The most substantial accuracy gains were observed between the ages of 7 and 10.

Conclusions:

  • While children utilize comparable strategies to adults for motion extrapolation, their computational efficiency is lower.
  • Developmental improvements in predicting occluded motion are most pronounced during middle childhood (ages 7-10).
  • Further research is needed to understand the specific computational mechanisms underlying these age-related differences.