Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The problem of multiple margins.

Bryan Dowd1

  • 1Division of Health Services Research, Policy, and Administration, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA. dowdx001@tc.umn.edu

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|October 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding and Addressing Upcoding.

Health services research·2025
Same author

Barriers primary care clinic leaders face to improving value in a consumer choice health plan design.

Health affairs scholar·2024
Same author

Understanding factors associated with increases in Medicare Advantage enrollment, 2007-2018.

The American journal of managed care·2023
Same author

Clinic price reductions in a tiered total cost benefit design.

The American journal of managed care·2021
Same author

Physician variation in the de-adoption of ineffective statin and fibrate therapy.

Health services research·2021
Same author

Patient and provider-level factors associated with changes in utilization of treatments in response to evidence on ineffectiveness or harm.

International journal of health economics and management·2020
Same journal

National Health Expenditure Projections, 2025-34: Strong Utilization Growth Initially, Legislative Impacts Later.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

State Medicaid Programs Face Increased Spending On Medicare Premiums.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Not enough time.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Medicaid Tobacco And Nicotine Cessation Treatment Rates Remained Low, 2019-24.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Third-Party Convener Firms And The Rise Of Geographically Dispersed, High-Earning Medicare ACOs.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

The Opacity Of Price Transparency.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
See all related articles

This study examines healthcare variations and outcomes, exploring theoretical issues to reconcile differing findings. Understanding different margins is key for predicting health care reform impacts.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Extends the foundational work of Wennberg and colleagues on healthcare service utilization variations.
  • Addresses apparent contradictions in the literature regarding variations and health outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore theoretical issues explaining observed variations in healthcare services.
  • To reconcile divergent findings on the relationship between service variations and patient outcomes.
  • To provide a framework for predicting the impact of health care reforms.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of healthcare utilization patterns.
  • Distinction and application of different types of margins in analysis.
  • Literature synthesis to reconcile conflicting study results.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identifies theoretical underpinnings for variations in healthcare use.
  • Clarifies the relationship between service variations and health outcomes by distinguishing margin types.
  • Provides a basis for understanding the implications of different healthcare delivery models.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the nuances of 'margins' is crucial for interpreting variations in healthcare.
  • Theoretical insights are necessary to reconcile seemingly contradictory empirical findings.
  • This framework aids in predicting the consequences of health care policy interventions.