Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Alfredo M Carbonell1, Justin M Burns, Amy E Lincourt

  • 1Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

The American Surgeon
|October 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exoskeletons as a potential intervention to support simulated perioperative staff tasks.

Journal of safety research·2026
Same author

En route to renal transplantation: peritoneal dialysis immediately after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bariatric surgery may be safe.

BMJ case reports·2026
Same author

Balancing operative risk and symptom relief: Outcomes of open versus laparoscopic release for median arcuate ligament syndrome: A retrospective study.

Journal of vascular surgery·2025
Same author

Mesh-related Outcomes of Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh for Single-stage Repair of Contaminated Ventral Hernias: A 5 to 10-year Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Annals of surgery·2025
Same author

Using the Alfapump® to control ascites enabling elective umbilical hernia repair: A case report.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2025
Same author

Exploring the Impact of the Physical Environment on Robotic-Assisted Surgery Outcomes and Processes: A Scoping Review.

Human factors·2025
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Pain in Surgeons on Operating Days.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Splenectomy During Cytoreductive Surgery: Marker of Surgical Burden or Independent Predictor of Morbidity?

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Predictors of a Long Hospital Stay After Abdominoperineal Resection of Rectal Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Robotic Resection of Right Perihilar Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Practical Technique of Major Hepatic Resection for Biliary Tract Cancer.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Application of the Heidelberg Prognostic Pancreatic Cancer Score for Survival Risk Stratification in Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Upfront Total Mesorectal Excision for MRI-Defined Low-Risk cT3 Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is superior to open appendectomy (OA) for appendicitis treatment. LA offers reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and similar safety, making it the preferred surgical approach.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research

Background:

  • The optimal surgical method for appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus open appendectomy (OA), remains debated.
  • Appendectomy is a common surgical procedure worldwide, necessitating evidence-based practice guidelines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical outcomes and economic impact of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus open appendectomy (OA).
  • To determine the preferred surgical approach for appendicitis based on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • A 5-year retrospective review of patients undergoing appendectomy.
  • Standard statistical methods were employed to analyze outcomes, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was performed in 207 patients, and open appendectomy (OA) in 100 patients (6.7% conversion rate).
  • LA patients experienced significantly less analgesic requirement (19.2 mg vs 31.5 mg) and shorter hospital stays (27.2 hours vs 53.1 hours) compared to OA patients.
  • While operating room charges were higher for LA ($3839 vs $2528), total hospital charges were comparable ($8801 vs $9147), and complication rates were similar (3.6% vs 8%).

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is recommended as the procedure of choice for appendicitis, irrespective of patient age, sex, BMI, or inflammation severity.
  • LA offers comparable safety and operative time to OA, with added benefits of reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospitalizations, without increasing overall healthcare costs.