Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

09:49
Continuous-wave Thulium Laser for Heating Cultured Cells to Investigate Cellular Thermal Effects
Published on: June 30, 2017
Minimal intensity diode laser (810 nanometer) photocoagulation (MIP) for diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME)
1The Retina Center of St. Louis County, 11710 Old Ballas Rd., Suite 102, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA.
Seminars in Ophthalmology
|October 19, 2004
Summary
Minimal intensity diode laser (810nm) photocoagulation effectively treats diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME), reducing or eliminating it in 74% of cases. This method offers improved visual field preservation and reduced scarring compared to older laser treatments.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment
- Laser Photocoagulation
Background:
- Diabetic macular edema (DDME) is a leading cause of vision loss in diabetic patients.
- Current treatments for DDME have limitations, including potential visual field defects and scarring.
Observation:
- This study evaluated minimal intensity diode laser (810nm) photocoagulation (MIP) for DDME.
- Patients received MIP or modified grid photocoagulation, with follow-up every 3-4 months.
- Visual acuity, visual fields, macular edema reduction, and treatment number were assessed.
Findings:
- MIP achieved reduction/elimination of DDME in approximately 74% of eyes within 24 months.
- Eighty-eight percent of patients maintained stable visual acuity.
- Factors like cystoid edema, poor initial acuity, macular ischemia, or hypertension did not negatively impact outcomes.
- Patients without systemic vascular disease showed better visual stabilization or improvement.
- MIP resulted in significantly reduced atrophic scarring and fewer pericentral visual field complaints compared to shorter wavelength lasers.
Implications:
- Minimal intensity diode laser (810nm) photocoagulation is an effective treatment for DDME.
- This technique offers advantages in preserving visual field function and minimizing retinal scarring.
- While resolution may be slightly prolonged, MIP presents a safer alternative for managing DDME.

