Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
When is it safer to say nothing? Some considerations on biases in sampling
Laurence G Moseley1, Donna M Mead
1School of Care Sciences, University of Glamorgan, UK.
Abstract:
In nursing research, once one has a solid design, one has still to think about-.a sampling strategy and implementation. Too often, the paraphernalia of inferential statistical reasoning is inappropriately deployed when the achieved sample can in no way be claimed to represent the drawn sample. Given the traditionally low rates of response in most nursing research (usually well under 90 per cent, and often unknown), there is a danger that perfectionist counsels would lead to an end to serious research. In this paper, Laurence Moseley and Donna Mead argue that such a nihilistic position is not necessary and that, instead, researchers should tailor their inferential analyses to the demands of any particular study. They argue that for many purposes, simple computations of both maximum and minimum population estimates are both defensible and useful.
Related Concept Videos
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Convenience Sampling Method
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Blind Procedures
Surveys
