Medical treatment with atropine sulfate for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

We investigated whether atropine sulfate was an effective, non-surgical method for treating hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS). The study group consisted of 5 patients, all of the patients presented with projectile vomiting. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis was diagnosed based on abdominal sonographic findings. The age when symptom arose was 30.8 +/- 15.5 (mean +/- SD) days, the age upon admission was 43.2 +/- 9.6 days. The frequency of vomiting was 5.8 +/- 2.3 times per day. After admission, all patients received 10% atropine sulfate 0.01 mg/kg intravenous (i.v.) for 5 minutes q4H (every four hours) before each feeding. Formular milk was started and increased by 10 ml every feeding until full feeding (120 ml/kg/day) was achieved. When vomiting had ceased for a period of one day, i.v. atropine was changed to 0.02 mg/kg oral q4H before each feeding. The patient was hospitalized until full feeding was maintained for more than 2 days. Then oral atropine was tapered by half a dose every 2 weeks. Oral atropine was continued until the thickness of the pyloric muscle had normalized (< 3.5 mm). All five patients were successfully treated with atropine sulfate. The frequency of vomiting was reduced to less than two times per day (1.8 +/- 1.3 days). i.v. atropine was used for 6.4 +/- 3.4 days, and the oral form was used for 30 +/- 9 days. The total number of days of atropine sulfate treatment was 36.4 +/- 9.58 days. Full feeding was achieved at 8 +/- 5.3 days. The hospitalization was 14.6 +/- 6.2 days. The body weight when admitted was 4000 +/- 760.8 gm and the body weight when discharged was 4282 +/- 901 gm. The body weight one month after treatment was 5210 +/- 772.5 gm. The body weight gain one month after atropine treatment was 1262 +/- 441.4 gm. Body weigh range on admission was from <3rd to 25th percentile, and after one month of atropine treatment, the body weight range was from 10th to 75th percentile. Complications included transiently elevated heart rates (180-200 times/min) in two patients and facial flushing after the first dose of IV atropine in one patient. In conclusion, conservative treatment with initially IV atropine in the initial stages instead of oral atropine sulfate is an effective alternative to pyloromyotomy, particularly in infants with major concurrent disease or when parents are unwilling to let their infants undergo surgery. Surgical intervention is not always necessary.