Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Critical comparison of consensus methods for molecular sequences.

W H Day1, F R McMorris

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada.

Nucleic Acids Research
|March 11, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Consensus methods are crucial for sequence data analysis in molecular biology. This study critically compares nine methods, offering guidance to prevent misuse and aid researchers in selecting appropriate tools for their applications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequel and Fatal Termination of a Case of Lymphatic Enlargement of the Right Leg and Thigh.

The Chicago medical journal and examiner·2023
Same author

On Gastrodynia.

Atlanta medical and surgical journal·2022
Same author

Diarrhœa of Teething Children.

The American journal of dental science·2019
Same author

Some axiomatic limitations for consensus and supertree functions on hierarchies.

Journal of theoretical biology·2016
Same author

Contact pressures in the loaded cadaver human hip.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2014
Same author

Extremes in the complexity of computing metric distances between partitions.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Consensus methods are widely used for data aggregation in sequence analysis.
  • Despite their importance in molecular biology, the features and limitations of these methods are often overlooked.
  • Misunderstanding or misuse of consensus sequence construction criteria can lead to inaccurate results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically compare nine different consensus methods for sequence data.
  • To highlight the features and limitations of each method.
  • To provide recommendations for selecting appropriate consensus methods for specific applications.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative analysis of nine distinct consensus methods for sequence data was performed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Eight of the evaluated methods were identified as being in current use within the journal's publications.
  • The study focused on the criteria and outcomes of consensus sequence construction.

    • Main Results:

    • The study presents a detailed comparison of the performance and characteristics of nine consensus methods.
    • Identified variations in how different methods construct consensus sequences.
    • Reported findings on the suitability of each method for particular applications.

    Conclusions:

    • Researchers should be aware of the specific features and limitations of consensus methods.
    • Careful selection of consensus methods is essential to avoid misuse and ensure accurate molecular biology data analysis.
    • The study provides valuable insights and recommendations to guide researchers in choosing the most effective consensus methods.