Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are working memory deficits in readers with learning disabilities hard to change?

H L Swanson1

  • 1Educational Psychology, School of Education, University of California, Riverside 92521, USA.

Journal of Learning Disabilities
|October 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reading research for students with LD: a meta-analysis of intervention outcomes.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

Treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: how important are internal and external validity?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

Are mathematics disabilities due to a domain-general or a domain-specific working memory deficit?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A subgroup analysis of working memory in children with reading disabilities: domain-general or domain-specific deficiency?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same journal

Associations Between Self-Reported Literacy and Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Children, Adolescents, and Older Adults.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Learning Disabilities Identification in U.S. Elementary Schools.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Universal Screening of Early Numeracy Skills in Spanish-Speaking Kindergarteners.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

AI Chatbots and Dyslexia: How AI Chatbots Empower Students With Dyslexia to Master Arithmetic Word Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Instructional Decision-Making for Students With Intensive Early Writing Needs: Student Growth in Sentence-Level Curriculum-Based Measurement.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Effects of Calculation and Reading Fluency Interventions Focusing on Awareness and Adaptive Use of Strategies: Supporting Children With Comorbid Fluency Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
See all related articles

Readers with learning disabilities (LD) show less working memory (WM) change across tasks compared to age-matched peers, suggesting a general system influences their WM retrieval abilities.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Working memory (WM) is crucial for reading comprehension.
  • Understanding WM deficits in learning disabilities (LD) is essential for targeted interventions.
  • The domain-specificity of WM in LD remains an area of active research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether working memory (WM) changes in readers with learning disabilities (LD) are governed by a general or domain-specific system.
  • To compare WM performance across phonological, visual-spatial, and semantic domains in readers with LD and control groups.

Main Methods:

  • Compared working memory (WM) performance in readers with LD, chronologically age-matched (CA-M), and reading level-matched (RL-M) children.
  • Assessed WM for phonological, visual-spatial, and semantic information under initial, gain, and maintenance conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed changes in performance using effect sizes and quadratic curve slopes.

    • Main Results:

    • Chronologically age-matched (CA-M) children outperformed readers with LD across all conditions.
    • Readers with LD exhibited less performance change in both visual-spatial and verbal WM tasks compared to CA-matched children.
    • Readers with LD performed better than RL-M children initially but worse in gain and maintenance conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Results suggest a general system moderates changes in the retrieval of phonological, visual-spatial, and semantic information in readers with LD.
    • Working memory performance in readers with LD is influenced by a unified system rather than domain-specific ones.
    • These findings have implications for understanding cognitive profiles in learning disabilities.