Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Kindling Mouse Model
Published on: June 12, 2018
Culpability for inducing mental states: the insanity defense of Dr. Jekyll
1Program in Psychiatry and Law at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. ed.mitchell@pmb.ox.ac.uk
Abstract:
Insanity acquittees are often (erroneously) believed to get away with murder. This article examines one possible cause of this view--that insanity acquittees may have, to various degrees, caused or exacerbated their own mental disorder in the first instance. Such a component of prior fault is illustrated with recourse to the putative insanity defense of Dr. Jekyll, who, while almost certainly not criminally responsible at the time he committed murder (in the guise of Mr. Hyde), was culpable for bringing about that nullification of responsibility (thereby causing the conditions of his own defense). Such culpability (also found in intoxication cases) is examined in relation to medication noncompliance in mentally disordered offenders, and possible solutions for dealing with "culpable madness" are presented.
Related Concept Videos
Deindividuation
Fundamental Attribution Error
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Reason and Intuition
