Related Experiment Videos
Montelukast has no ergogenic effect on cycle ergometry in cold temperature
Kenneth W Rundell1, Barry A Spiering, Jennifer M Baumann
1Human Performance Laboratory, Keith J. O'Neill Center for Healthy Families, Marywood University, Scranton, PA 18509, USA. rundell@marywood.edu
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
|October 30, 2004
Summary
A single 10-mg dose of montelukast (ML) did not enhance physical performance in athletes with or without exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). This suggests ML can be safely used for EIB prophylaxis in international sports.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Medicine
- Respiratory Medicine
Background:
- Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a common condition affecting athletes.
- Montelukast (ML) is a medication used for asthma and allergy management.
- The ergogenic potential and prophylactic use of ML in athletes, particularly in cold environments, require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a single 10-mg dose of montelukast (ML) on the physical performance of athletes with (EIB+) and without (EIB-) exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.
- To assess the efficacy of ML as a prophylactic agent against EIB in a cold environment.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-four male college ice hockey players underwent two maximal work accumulation tests on a cycle ergometer in subfreezing temperatures (-2.5°C).
- Participants received either 10 mg of ML or a placebo (PL) 6-8 hours before each test.
- Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was assessed by monitoring the fall in FEV1 post-exercise.
Main Results:
- Eight athletes (33%) were classified as EIB+ (≥15% fall in FEV1), while 16 were EIB- (<15% fall in FEV1).
- ML demonstrated approximately 50% protection against post-exercise FEV1 decline in EIB+ athletes.
- No significant differences in total work accumulated (kJ) were observed between ML and PL trials for pooled, EIB-, or EIB+ subjects.
- EIB- athletes accumulated significantly more work than EIB+ athletes in both PL and ML conditions.
Conclusions:
- A single 10-mg dose of ML did not provide an ergogenic effect for athletes performing short-duration, high-intensity exercise in cold conditions.
- The findings support the use of montelukast as a prophylactic treatment for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in international sports competitions.
- Montelukast's primary benefit appears to be in mitigating EIB symptoms rather than enhancing athletic performance.