Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standardization and comparability of CASA instruments.

R O Davis1, D F Katz

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.

Journal of Andrology
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vaginal deployment and tenofovir delivery by microbicide gels.

Drug delivery and translational research·2015
Same author

Propranolol in myocardial infarction.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Comparison of the rheological properties of Advantage-S and Replens.

Contraception·2002
Same author

Rheological properties of contraceptive gels.

Contraception·2001
Same author

Using online and offline change models to improve ICU access and revenues.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2001
Same author

Using the online and offline change model to improve efficiency for fast-track patients in an emergency department.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2000

Computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) systems, HTM and CTS, show slight, clinically insignificant differences in analyzing sperm concentration and motility compared to manual methods. Kinematic variable analysis also revealed minor variations between systems.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Biology
  • Andrology
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Sperm analysis is crucial for male fertility assessment.
  • Computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) offers automated semen evaluation.
  • Comparing different CASA systems and manual methods is essential for validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and concordance of two CASA systems (HTM and CTS) against each other and against standard manual semen analysis.
  • To evaluate CASA performance for sperm concentration (CON), percent motility (MOT), and kinematic variables (VSL, VCL, LIN, ALH).

Main Methods:

  • Thirty human semen specimens were analyzed manually.
  • Specimens were videotaped and analyzed using HTM and CTS CASA systems.
  • Analysis included sperm concentration, percent motility, and kinematic variables over 5 or 15 frames.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • CASA systems showed no significant difference in sperm concentration compared to manual methods, with minor variations between HTM and CTS.
  • Percent motility values from CASA were lower than manual assessments; 5-frame analysis yielded higher motility than 15-frame analysis.
  • Kinematic variables VSL and LIN showed slight differences between HTM and CTS, but high concordance. VCL showed close concordance, while ALH revealed significant differences between instruments.

Conclusions:

  • HTM and CTS CASA systems demonstrate generally good agreement with each other and manual methods for sperm analysis.
  • Minor differences observed between CASA systems and manual counts, and between the two CASA systems, are likely not clinically significant.
  • CASA technology provides a reliable, albeit slightly variable, alternative for andrology laboratories.