Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Published on: December 14, 2017
Whose fault is it anyway? A practical illustration of human factors in process safety
Gareth Hughes1, Megan Kornowa-Weichel
1Det Norske Veritas Inc., 16340 Park Ten Place, Suite 100, Houston, TX 77084, USA. gareth.hughes@dnv.com
Abstract:
Major process accidents have typically occurred not through a single failure, but through a combination of events, some of which had contributors from past actions and failures (latent or unrevealed failures). People are integral and key features of business systems; therefore systems, tools, and equipment should be designed with the potential capabilities and limitations of people in mind. This paper demonstrates the benefits of using human factors approaches to improve system safety and reliability. Practical examples from past experience are quoted and a framework for human error prediction is described. Guidance is given on the practicalities of deriving recommendations from these types of studies.
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Fault Types
For line-to-line faults occurring between phases B and C, the...
Free-body Diagrams: Problem Solving
For example, consider a block with a mass of 10 kg released on an inclined plane at an angle of 30° to the horizontal, where the...
Power System Three-Phase Short Circuits