Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation.

Anders Winman1, Patrik Hansson, Peter Juslin

  • 1Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, SE-751 42 Uppsala, Sweden. anders.winman@psyk.uu.se

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 4, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Assessment format significantly impacts judgments of overconfidence. Evaluating interval probabilities nearly eliminates overconfidence bias compared to producing intervals, suggesting a naive sampling bias.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: Impact of dietary factors on human gut microbiota and gastrointestinal endocrinology.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2026
Same author

Use of Metabotyping to Identify Individuals With Different Triglyceride Response Curves After Intake of High-Fat Meals.

Molecular nutrition & food research·2026
Same author

Playing for Keeps: Long-Term Recall With an Application Using Virtual Reality and the Method of Loci.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026
Same author

Changes in plasma fatty acid composition in females with lipedema following low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets and associations with pain reduction.

Nutrition journal·2026
Same author

Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Incurable Cancer: Exploring the Heterogenous and Non-Randomised Clinical Landscape.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2025
Same author

Changes in Cytokines and Fibrotic Growth Factors after Low-Carbohydrate or Low-Fat Low-Energy Diets in Females with Lipedema.

Current developments in nutrition·2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Overconfidence bias is a well-documented phenomenon in human judgment.
  • The way uncertainty is assessed can influence conclusions about confidence levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of assessment format on overconfidence bias.
  • To explore the effectiveness of adaptive adjustment as a debiasing tool.
  • To propose a theoretical explanation for format-dependent biases.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted comparing interval production and probability evaluation formats.
  • Participants assessed subjective probability distributions for uncertain quantities.
  • A method for adaptive adjustment of probability intervals was applied.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Overconfidence bias was significantly reduced when participants evaluated the probability of intervals containing the true quantity, compared to producing intervals.
  • The adaptive adjustment method proved effective in debiasing interval production.
  • Results align with a naive sampling model where sample proportion and dispersion are treated as unbiased estimators.

Conclusions:

  • The format used to assess subjective probabilities critically influences the degree of overconfidence observed.
  • Naive sampling provides a plausible explanation for the observed format-dependent biases in probability assessment and interval production.
  • Adaptive adjustment techniques show promise for mitigating overconfidence in decision-making.