Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision.

R R Hudson1, D D Boos, N L Kaplan

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine 92717.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Type I error robustness of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks when the number of treatments is large.

Biometrics·2009
Same author

Population genetics of CAPN10 and GPR35: implications for the evolution of type 2 diabetes variants.

American journal of human genetics·2005
Same author

Type I error and the power of the s-test: old lessons from a new, analytically justified statistical test for phylogenies.

Systematic biology·2002
Same author

Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs.

Theoretical population biology·2002
Same author

Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes using the pedigree disequilibrium test.

Genetic epidemiology·2002
Same author

Two-locus sampling distributions and their application.

Genetics·2002
Same journal

Evolution of CTCF binding sites in the human genome.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Recent plastid replacement in Karlodinium ballantinum (Kareniaceae, Dinoflagellata) challenges the paradigms of endosymbiotic gene transfer.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Segmentally Duplicated Regulatory Elements Undergo Human-Specific Rewiring.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

The life history of recessive deleterious alleles as seen through the eyes of a honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: Insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a statistical test to detect genetic differentiation between subpopulations using DNA sequence data. The test is powerful for detecting genetic differences, especially with larger sample sizes and when genes undergo recombination.

Area of Science:

  • Population Genetics
  • Molecular Evolution

Background:

  • Genetic differentiation is crucial for understanding population structure and evolutionary processes.
  • Detecting subtle genetic differences between subpopulations requires robust statistical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a statistical test for detecting genetic differentiation among subpopulations using molecular variation.
  • To assess the factors influencing the power of this test.

Main Methods:

  • The study describes a statistical test utilizing DNA sequence variation from multiple localities.
  • Statistical significance is determined using Monte Carlo simulations.
  • The test's power is analyzed within a Wright-Fisher island model framework.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The test's power is substantial with sample sizes of 50 when 4Nm < 10.
  • Factors influencing power include sample size, migration rates, mutation, and recombination.
  • Genes with recombination yield more powerful tests than those without.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical test is effective for detecting genetic differentiation in subpopulations.
  • Recombination and adequate sample sizes enhance the test's power.
  • This method aids in studying population structure and evolutionary dynamics.