Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How do RNA folding algorithms work?

Sean R Eddy1

  • 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute & Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park Blvd., Box 8510, Saint Louis, Missouri 63108, USA. eddy@genetics.wustl.edu

Nature Biotechnology
|November 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HMMER web server: 2026 update.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Induction of menstruation in mice reveals the regulation of menstrual shedding.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Presence of group II introns in phage genomes.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Prevalence of Group II Introns in Phage Genomes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Cellular evolution of the hypothalamic preoptic area of behaviorally divergent deer mice.

eLife·2025
Same author

Cellular evolution of the hypothalamic preoptic area of behaviorally divergent deer mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024

RNA folding algorithms like MFOLD and ViennaRNA predict secondary structures but struggle with pseudoknots. Their accuracy is limited, with ongoing research aiming for improvements in RNA structure prediction.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • RNA secondary structure prediction is crucial for understanding RNA function.
  • Algorithms like MFOLD and ViennaRNA are standard tools for this task.
  • Limitations exist in current predictive models, particularly concerning complex RNA structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the working principles of RNA secondary structure prediction algorithms.
  • To investigate the inherent limitations of these algorithms in predicting RNA pseudoknots.
  • To assess the current accuracy of RNA structure prediction and discuss future advancements.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established algorithms (e.g., MFOLD, ViennaRNA) based on dynamic programming and energy minimization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the algorithmic constraints that prevent the accurate prediction of RNA pseudoknots.
  • Evaluation of prediction accuracy through comparison with experimental data and existing literature.

    • Main Results:

    • MFOLD and ViennaRNA utilize dynamic programming to predict the lowest free energy secondary structure.
    • These algorithms cannot predict pseudoknots due to their non-nested base-pairing requirements.
    • Current prediction accuracy is high for simple structures but decreases significantly for those with pseudoknots.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the mechanisms and limitations of RNA folding algorithms is essential.
    • Future research needs to develop novel approaches to accurately predict complex RNA structures, including pseudoknots.
    • Improvements in RNA structure prediction accuracy will enhance our understanding of RNA biology and disease.