Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What determines limb selection for reaching?

Casi Rabb Helbig1, Carl Gabbard

  • 1Department of Health and Kinesiology at Texas Lutheran University, USA.

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
|November 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Limb selection for reaching movements in contralateral space is primarily driven by stimulus-hand proximity, not motor dominance or comfort. This finding impacts understanding of motor control and spatial awareness.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of affordances on physical literacy and quality of life: investigating the nonlinear approach of fundamental movement skills and a selection of handball sports skills.

BMC pediatrics·2025
Same author

Maternal Emotional Intelligence and the Provision of Child Motor Affordances.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Effects of affordances in the home environment on children's personal-social, problem-solving, and communication skills.

Child: care, health and development·2020
Same author

Associations Between the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire - Brazilian Version (DCDQ-BR) and Motor Competence in School-Age Children.

Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics·2019
Same author

The Impact of Home Motor Affordances on Motor, Cognitive and Social Development of Young Children.

Iranian journal of child neurology·2019
Same author

A Program to Improve Reach Estimation and Reduce Fall Risk in the Elderly.

Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)·2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Motor dominance influences limb selection for ipsilateral movements.
  • The determinants of limb selection for contralateral movements are less understood.
  • Previous research has not fully distinguished between proximity and hemispheric bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the primary drivers of limb selection for reaching movements in contralateral space.
  • To differentiate between object proximity and hemispheric bias in contralateral limb selection.
  • To assess the role of comfort in limb selection during reaching tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Compared imagined and actual reaching with crossed and uncrossed arms to assess proximity vs. hemispheric bias.
  • Experiment 2: Examined limb selection for 1-degree-of-freedom (df) and multiple-df movements to evaluate comfort.
  • Utilized reaching tasks with visual stimuli presented in contralateral hemispace.

Main Results:

  • A significant proximity effect was observed; participants favored reaching with the ipsilateral hand closest to the stimulus, even if it meant crossing their arms.
  • Comfort did not appear to be a primary factor, as participants continued to prefer the non-dominant hand in certain conditions.
  • Limb selection was not solely based on motor dominance when stimuli were presented contralaterally.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus-hand proximity is the dominant factor in limb selection for contralateral reaching movements.
  • Motor dominance and comfort play secondary roles compared to proximity in this context.
  • Findings suggest a spatially-driven mechanism for limb selection in response to contralateral stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos