Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking

The detectability of a pure-tone signal may be reduced by adding a small number of randomly drawn masker tones remote from the signal frequency, an effect attributed to informational masking. A pretrial cue consisting of either the upcoming signal or masker releases informational masking, but a pretrial cue of the signal-plus-masker stimulus does not. In these experiments the relative potency of pre- and posttrial cues in releasing informational masking was examined. In separate conditions the masker-alone and signal-plus-masker stimuli were cues. The results indicated a masker-first advantage, i.e., sensitivity was superior when a masker cue preceded a yes/no trial interval compared to (a) when a signal-plus-masker preceded the trial, and (b) when either cue type followed the yes/no trial interval. A masker-first advantage was also obtained when the results from a two-interval forced-choice same/different task were examined. In contrast, a masker-first advantage was not obtained when the frequency of the signal to be detected was random. For detection tasks using random multi-tone maskers there may be differences in processing efficiency depending on the order in which stimuli are presented. The "masker-first advantage" may depend, in part, on observers maintaining their attention at the signal frequency.