Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Which solvent for olfactory testing?

C M Philpott1, P C Goodenough, C R Wolstenholme

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. carl.philpott@btopenworld.com

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences
|November 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The APOLLO trial: a proof-of-concept study for vitamin A nasal drops in COVID-19-related postinfectious olfactory dysfunction.

Chemical senses·2026
Same author

Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.

Rhinology·2024
Same author

Consensus criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: an international Delphi Study.

Rhinology·2023
Same author

Commentary on Patient Advocacy and Research Priorities in Olfactory and Gustatory Disorders.

Current otorhinolaryngology reports·2023
Same author

The socioeconomic cost of chronic rhinosinusitis study.

Rhinology·2020
Same author

European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020.

Rhinology·2020
Same journal

Correspondence.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2017
Same journal

Erratum.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2013
Same journal

Compact training course in ear surgery erlangen, Germany, 26-28 february 1998.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2013
Same journal

How we do it: a practical approach to Foley catheter posterior nasal packing.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
Same journal

How we do it: management of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
Same journal

Is cochlear outer hair cell function affected by mobile telephone radiation?

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
See all related articles

Mineral oil is the best clean, odorless carrier for olfactory testing, maintaining consistent results over time. Silicone oil is a viable alternative for specific odorants, ensuring reliable olfactory assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Olfactory research
  • Sensory science
  • Chemical properties of solvents

Background:

  • Carrier properties can degrade, affecting olfactory test accuracy.
  • Need for stable, odorless carriers in olfactory testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clinically evaluate potential solvents as odorless carriers for olfactory testing.
  • Assess the long-term stability and suitability of various solvents.

Main Methods:

  • Weekly olfactory assessment of seven solvents (sweet almond oil, coconut oil, peach kernel oil, dipropylene glycol, monopropylene glycol, mineral oil, silicone oil) by six volunteers.
  • Cross-reference testing using phenylethyl-alcohol and 1-butanol dilutions over eight weeks to detect concentration differences.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mineral oil demonstrated the most desirable characteristics as an olfactory solvent.
  • Silicone oil showed potential as an alternative for miscible odorants.

Conclusions:

  • Mineral oil is the most suitable carrier for olfactory testing due to its stability and odorless nature.
  • Silicone oil offers a suitable alternative for specific applications in olfactory testing.