Related Experiment Videos
Mathematical assumptions versus biological reality: myths in affected sib pair linkage analysis
Robert C Elston1, Danhong Song, Sudha K Iyengar
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, 2103 Cornell Road, Cleveland, OH 44106-7281, USA. rce@darwin.case.edu
Abstract:
Affected sib pair (ASP) analysis has become common ever since it was shown that, under very specific assumptions, ASPs afford a powerful design for linkage analysis. In 2003, Vieland and Huang, on the basis of a "fundamental heterogeneity equation," proved that heterogeneity and epistasis are confounded in ASP linkage analysis. A much more serious limitation of ASP linkage analysis is the implicit assumption that randomly sampled sib pairs share half their alleles identical by descent at any locus, whereas a critical assumption underlying Vieland and Huang's proof is that of joint Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium proportions at two trait loci. These are considered as examples of mathematical assumptions that may not always reflect biological reality. More-robust sib-pair designs and appropriate methods for their analysis have long been available.
Related Concept Videos
Probability Laws
Epistasis Analysis
Pedigree Analysis
Pedigree Analysis
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle