Related Experiment Videos
Steadiness in one-legged stance: development of a reliable force-platform testing procedure
P A Goldie1, O M Evans, T M Bach
1Department of Physiotherapy, Lincoln School of Health Sciences, Latrobe University, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
|April 1, 1992
Summary
A new one-legged stance test protocol using a force platform is reliable for assessing postural steadiness. This method improves upon previous protocols, offering a feasible way to evaluate balance in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Kinesiology
- Human Movement Science
Background:
- Postural steadiness assessment is crucial for evaluating unilateral injuries and disorders.
- Existing test protocols require demonstrated feasibility and reliability for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a feasible and reliable testing protocol for measuring postural steadiness in a one-legged stance.
- To investigate the within-session retest reliability of the developed protocol in healthy young adults.
Main Methods:
- Developed a force platform-based testing protocol for one-legged stance, with eyes open and closed.
- Collected performance data using standard deviation of orthogonal force components and center of pressure (CP) coordinates.
- Employed strategies to minimize data loss due to balance loss during trials.
Main Results:
- The developed protocol demonstrated substantially improved retest reliability compared to earlier methods.
- Force-based performance scores exhibited higher retest reliability than CP-based scores, a statistically significant finding in some stances.
- Factor analysis indicated that force measures are superior predictors of one-legged stance steadiness.
Conclusions:
- The validated force platform protocol offers a reliable and feasible method for assessing postural steadiness in a one-legged stance.
- This protocol supports the development of clinical and experimental trials using a repeated-measures design with the nonaffected leg as a control.
- Force measures are recommended over CP measures for evaluating postural steadiness due to superior reliability and predictive power.