Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Andrea Cesalpino and systemic circulation].

P Prioreschi1

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA. plinic@creighton.edu

Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises
|November 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paracelsus: a reevaluation.

Annales pharmaceutiques francaises·2006
Same author

Determinants of the revival of dissection of the human body in the Middle Ages.

Medical hypotheses·2001
Same author

Alternative medicine in ancient and medieval history.

Medical hypotheses·2000
Same author

Or was 'blood as the river of life' just poetic?

Nature·2000
Same author

A quantitative assessment of ancient therapeutics: poppy and pain in the Hippocratic Corpus.

Medical hypotheses·1998
Same author

Galenicae Quaestiones Disputatae Duae: rete mirabile and pulmonary circulation.

Vesalius : acta internationales historiae medicinae·1996

Andrea Cesalpino demonstrated a clear understanding of blood circulation decades before William Harvey. Historical dismissal of Cesalpino's work stemmed from misinterpretations and translation errors, challenging Harvey's sole credit for discovery.

Area of Science:

  • History of Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Renaissance Science

Background:

  • William Harvey's 1628 publication 'De motu Cordis' traditionally credits him with discovering blood circulation.
  • A minority view suggests Andrea Cesalpino, active in the 16th century, predates Harvey's discovery.
  • Previous assessments have largely minimized Cesalpino's contribution to understanding blood circulation.

Discussion:

  • This study re-examines Cesalpino's original Latin texts on circulation, addressing criticisms of his work.
  • Misinterpretations and inaccurate translations of Cesalpino's writings have contributed to the historical underestimation of his findings.
  • Critics often failed to analyze all relevant passages, leading to a skewed understanding of Cesalpino's conceptualization of blood flow.

Key Insights:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cesalpino possessed a comprehensive understanding of blood circulation several decades prior to Harvey's publication.
  • The prevailing historical narrative has overlooked or misinterpreted Cesalpino's significant contributions.
  • The definition of 'discovery' is crucial when attributing the elucidation of blood circulation.

Outlook:

  • Re-evaluation of historical scientific contributions requires rigorous textual analysis and accurate translation.
  • Further research may uncover other underappreciated contributions to early cardiovascular science.
  • This work prompts a nuanced understanding of scientific progress and attribution in historical contexts.