Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.

Paul N Valenstein1, Ronald L Sirota

  • 1Pathology Division, Michigan Multispecialty Physicians, 5301 East Huron River Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-3058, USA. paul@valenstein.org

Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
|November 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DA-REPOCH Versus R-CHOP for the Treatment of Activated B-Cell Subtype Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Community Center Experience.

Cureus·2020
Same author

Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology.

Journal of pathology informatics·2011
Same author

Recommendations for validating estrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry assays.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2010
Same author

Responding to large-scale testing errors.

American journal of clinical pathology·2010
Same author

Document control practices in 120 clinical laboratories.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2009
Same author

Physician satisfaction with clinical laboratory services: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 138 institutions.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2009
Same journal

Advances in Hemostasis Laboratory Testing.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Extracellular Vesicles in Hemostasis.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Thrombin Generation Assay: Ready for Prime Time.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Viscoelastic Testing for the Laboratorian: Recent Advances and Practical Advice.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Recommendations for Harmonization of Hemostasis Testing Across Hospital Sites.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

The Role of Hypoxia in Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction and Venous Thromboembolism.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Patient and specimen identification errors pose risks in healthcare, often occurring before testing begins. Technological solutions can help detect and correct these critical errors, improving patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Pathology
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Identification errors, including misidentification of patients or specimens, can lead to patient harm.
  • These errors are most frequent during the preanalytic phase of the testing cycle.
  • Rates vary, with transfusion medicine at 0.05% and general laboratory specimens around 1%, potentially higher in anatomic pathology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the prevalence and impact of patient and specimen identification errors.
  • To discuss the root causes, including cognitive failures.
  • To explore technological solutions for error detection and correction.

Main Methods:

  • Review of identification error rates across different laboratory disciplines.
  • Discussion of contributing factors, including human cognitive processes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of technological interventions such as bar-coding and RFID.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification errors are a significant concern, particularly in the preanalytic phase.
    • Anatomic pathology may exhibit the highest error rates due to complex handling.
    • Cognitive failures are recognized as unavoidable contributors to errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Technological advancements offer promising strategies to mitigate identification errors.
    • Implementing systems with bar-coded labels or RFID tags can enhance accuracy.
    • These technologies have the potential to significantly reduce misidentification incidents and improve patient safety.