Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks.

Jos J Adam1, Jay Pratt

  • 1Department of Movement Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands. jos.adam@bw.unimaas.nl

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|December 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The mind's average: Unseen, internally generated ensemble representations can guide visual attention.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

'Not so intuitive' physics: Orientation supersedes stability in prioritizing attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Rapid development of inhibitory effects in response to novel features: It's mostly target-feature enhancement.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Crossmodal response precueing: age-related differences in action preparation.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2025
Same author

Examining visual prior entry of semantic affective valences: positive is biased over negative.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

Exploring the effects of mapping rule switching on motor preparation in young and older adults: evidence from combining response cuing and task switching methodology.

Psychological research·2025
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Spatial precuing effects differ based on response type. Keypress responses are influenced by effector selection, while pointing and detection rely on visual attention.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Motor control

Background:

  • Response precuing effects are crucial for understanding motor planning.
  • Previous research suggested spatial extent, not choice number, determines these effects.
  • The role of effectors in visuomotor tasks requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test and reject the hypothesis that response precuing effects depend on spatial extent.
  • To support the hypothesis that the number of effectors influences spatial precuing effects.
  • To investigate dissociations in planning different response types.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to analyze spatial precuing effects.
  • Response types included keypress, pointing, and detection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data analysis focused on comparing precuing effect patterns across response modalities.

    • Main Results:

    • The study rejected the spatial extent hypothesis for response precuing.
    • The number of effectors was confirmed as a determinant of spatial precuing effects.
    • Keypress responses showed distinct precuing patterns compared to pointing and detection responses.

    Conclusions:

    • A clear dissociation exists between planning keypress and pointing responses.
    • Visuomotor tasks with one effector (pointing/detection) are driven by visual attention.
    • Visuomotor tasks with multiple effectors (keypress) are dominated by effector selection.