Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Method for detecting auditory steady-state potentials recorded from humans.

C A Champlin1

  • 1Department of Speech Communication, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

Hearing Research
|February 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Survey of Audiological Practices in the United States.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

What an osteopathic lesion means to me.

Year book. Academy of Applied Osteopathy·2010
Same author

Acute effect of nicotine on non-smokers: I. OAEs and ABRs.

Hearing research·2001
Same author

Acute effect of nicotine on non-smokers: II. MLRs and 40-Hz responses.

Hearing research·2001
Same author

Acute effect of nicotine on non-smokers: III. LLRs and EEGs.

Hearing research·2001
Same author

Comparison of auditory evoked potentials in heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual males and females.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2001
Same journal

Effects of early hearing deficits on olivocochlear efferent neuron morphology in mice.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear aging after synaptopathic noise: age-noise interactions in hair cell loss and axonal degeneration.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

MERGE: Misophonia and emotion regulation in a guided experience sampling study.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Repopulating microglia recapitulate developmental characteristics during a period of auditory circuit recovery.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Deficits in tail-lift and air-righting reflexes in rats after ototoxicity associate with loss of vestibular type I hair cells.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Slc16a5 (MCT6) knockout induces sex-dependent changes in auditory function, hair cell viability and cochlear transcriptomic programs in the mouse.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) is the most sensitive method for detecting auditory steady-state potentials. This phase-incorporating technique accurately predicts hearing thresholds, outperforming amplitude-only methods.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Electroencephalography (EEG)
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Auditory steady-state potentials (ASSPs) are objective measures of auditory function.
  • Accurate detection of ASSPs is crucial for assessing hearing thresholds, especially in challenging cases.
  • Existing methods for ASSP detection vary in sensitivity and reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of three frequency-domain methods for detecting auditory steady-state potentials.
  • To evaluate the performance of magnitude-squared coherence (MSC), phase coherence (PC), and magnitude only (MO) methods.
  • To determine the most reliable method for predicting hearing thresholds from ASSPs.

Main Methods:

  • Auditory steady-state potentials were recorded from adult humans using 100-microsecond click stimuli at 39.1 Hz.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Four stimulus levels were tested: -20, 0, 10, and 20 dB SL.
  • Response detection was performed using magnitude-squared coherence (MSC), phase coherence (PC), and magnitude only (MO) frequency-domain methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) demonstrated the highest sensitivity (d' values) for detecting ASSPs.
    • The MSC method yielded the lowest predicted hearing threshold, within 4 dB of behavioral thresholds.
    • Response amplitude variability was higher than phase variability and independent of noise amplitude.

    Conclusions:

    • Frequency-domain methods incorporating phase information, such as MSC and PC, are superior to amplitude-only methods for ASSP detection.
    • MSC is recommended as the most sensitive and accurate method for identifying auditory responses and predicting hearing thresholds.
    • Phase information is critical for reliable ASSP detection and threshold estimation.