Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection.

Florian Waszak1, Edmund Wascher, Peter Keller

  • 1Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Amalienstr. 33, 80799, Munich, Germany. f.waszak@gmx.net

Experimental Brain Research
|December 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals distinct brain activity patterns for stimulus-driven versus intention-driven actions. Understanding these action control modes, stimulus-response (S-R) and response-stimulus (R-S) bindings, is key for cognitive science.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond composite scores in chronotype assessment: item-level predictive patterns in the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Task interruptions impair visuospatial working memory: Behavioral and EEG evidence for feature-specific cognitive interference.

Brain research·2026
Same author

Predicting infant social attention: The role of temperament and mother-child interaction.

Infant behavior & development·2026
Same author

Hands can play equal roles in bimanual single-object rotations.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The latent organization of white matter microstructure and its relation to fluid intelligence.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Cardiac phase modulates behavior and response related lateralization in visual spatial conflicts during change detection.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Human actions are broadly categorized as stimulus-based or intention-based.
  • The ideomotor framework posits intention-based actions link to anticipated effects (response-stimulus [R-S] bindings), while stimulus-based actions link to external cues (stimulus-response [S-R] bindings).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct functional signatures of stimulus-based and intention-based action control.
  • To differentiate the neural underpinnings of exogenous (stimulus-driven) and endogenous (intention-driven) action selection.

Main Methods:

  • A temporal bisection task was employed to compare action control modes.
  • Participants engaged in either stimulus-based actions (responding to a stimulus) or intention-based actions (producing a subsequent stimulus).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record event-related potentials (ERPs) during action preparation.

    • Main Results:

    • Intention-based actions were temporally biased towards their anticipated effects (R-S bindings).
    • Stimulus-based actions were temporally biased towards the preceding stimulus (S-R bindings).
    • EEG data revealed significant differences in brain activity during action preparation between the two modes.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings provide converging evidence for distinct functional mechanisms underlying stimulus-based and intention-based action control.
    • This supports the existence of two primary modes of action selection: one driven by external stimuli (exogenous) and the other by internal intentions (endogenous).