Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
The influences of visibility and anomalous integration processes on the perception of global spatial form versus
Anita J Simmers1, Tim Ledgeway, Robert F Hess
1Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University, London EC1V OHB 22, UK. a.simmers@city.ac.uk
Abstract:
Do amblyopes demonstrate general irregularities in processes of global image integration? Or are these anomalies stimulus specific? To address these questions we employed directly analogous global-orientation and global-motion stimuli using a method that allows us to factor out any influence of the low-level visibility loss [Simmers, A. J., Ledgeway, T., Hess, R. F., & McGraw, P. V. (2003). Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia. Vision Research 43, pp. 729-738]. The combination of orientation and motion coherence thresholds reported here provides comparable psychophysical measures of global processing by spatial-sensitive and motion-sensitive mechanisms in the amblyopic visual system. The results show deficits in both global-orientation and global-motion processing in amblyopia, which appear independent of any low-level visibility loss, but with the most severe deficit affecting the extraction of global motion. This provides evidence for the existence of a dominant temporal processing deficit in amblyopia.
Related Concept Videos
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
