Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Contrast effects or loss aversion? Comment on Usher and McClelland (2004)
Jerome R Busemeyer1, James T Townsend, Adele Diederich
1Psychology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. jbusemey@indiana.edu
Abstract:
M. Usher and J. L. McClelland (2004) recently proposed a new connectionist type of model to explain context effects on preferential choice including the similarity, attraction, and compromise effects. They compared their model with an earlier connectionist type model for these same effects proposed by R. Roe, J. R. Busemeyer, and J. T. Townsend (2001) and raised several new issues. The authors address these issues and point out the main theoretical differences between the 2 explanations for context effects.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
07:12A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Framing Effects
Cognitive Dissonance
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Actor-Observer Effect
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect