Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Towards Dependent Race Models for the Stop-Signal Paradigm: The Copula Approach.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Predicting the sound-induced flash illusion: A time-window-of-integration approach.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Measuring Multisensory Integration in Reaction Time: Relative Entropy Approach.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Individual differences moderate effects in an Unusual Disease paradigm: A psychophysical data collection lab approach and an online experiment.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Keep your budget together! Investigating determinants on risky decision-making about losses.

PloS one·2022
Same author

A two-stage diffusion modeling approach to the compelled-response task.

Psychological review·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

A Dynamic Dual Process Model for Binary Choices: Serial Versus Parallel Architecture.

Adele Diederich1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.

Computational Brain & Behavior
|July 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a dynamic dual process model for decision-making, offering testable predictions for choice probability and response times. It explores how serial versus parallel processing architectures impact these predictions.

Keywords:
Dual process modelsParallel processingSequential samplingSerial processingTwo-stage stochastic process

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dual process theories propose two distinct cognitive systems (System 1 and System 2) influencing decision-making.
  • Existing dual-process models often lack rigorous, testable predictions, remaining largely descriptive.
  • A dynamic dual process model framework based on stochastic processes offers a quantitative approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a dynamic dual process model framework for rigorous testing of decision-making theories.
  • To investigate the architectural differences between serial and parallel processing within this framework.
  • To examine how factors like timing, time constraints, and architecture influence model predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a dynamic dual process model based on stochastic processes.
  • Simulation studies to analyze the influence of System 1 timing, time constraints, and processing architecture (serial vs. parallel).
  • Fitting serial and parallel processing versions of the model to published empirical data.

Main Results:

  • The dynamic dual process model generates testable qualitative and quantitative predictions for choice probability and response time distributions.
  • Simulation results illustrate the impact of processing architecture and other factors on model predictions in binary choice scenarios.
  • Model fitting to existing data allows for empirical validation of the serial and parallel processing architectures.

Conclusions:

  • The dynamic dual process model provides a rigorous, quantitative framework for understanding decision-making.
  • The architecture of cognitive processing (serial vs. parallel) significantly influences model predictions and decision outcomes.
  • This framework enables precise predictions and empirical testing of dual-process theories in cognitive science.