Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

41.4K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
41.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

119
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
119
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting the sound-induced flash illusion: A time-window-of-integration approach.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Measuring Multisensory Integration in Reaction Time: Relative Entropy Approach.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.

eLife·2019
Same author

Paradox resolved: Stop signal race model with negative dependence.

Psychological review·2018
Same author

Formal models and quantitative measures of multisensory integration: a selective overview.

The European journal of neuroscience·2017
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 3, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

A two-stage diffusion modeling approach to the compelled-response task.

Adele Diederich1, Hans Colonius2

  • 1Jacobs University Bremen.

Psychological Review
|June 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new two-stage-diffusion model to explain decision-making in a compelled-response task. The model accurately predicts reaction times and choice probabilities, offering insights into perception-motor planning interactions.

More Related Videos

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.8K
A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
08:01

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli

Published on: August 12, 2016

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K
Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.8K
A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
08:01

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli

Published on: August 12, 2016

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Understanding the interaction between perception and motor planning is crucial for explaining action selection.
  • The compelled-response task involves making an eye movement before knowing the correct target, forcing choices based on limited information.
  • Salinas' race-to-threshold model explains variability in choices by the initial state of information accumulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a novel non-time-homogeneous two-stage-diffusion model for decision-making.
  • To account for response time distributions and choice probabilities in the compelled-response task.
  • To connect the compelled-response paradigm with established decision-making theories.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a two-stage-diffusion model.
  • Modeling of response time distributions and choice probabilities.
  • Analysis of behavioral data from the compelled-response task.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model successfully predicts both response time distributions and choice probabilities.
  • The model utilizes interpretable parameters and does not require cross-trial parameter variability.
  • The model's predictions, such as bimodal reaction time distributions, are falsifiable.

Conclusions:

  • The two-stage-diffusion model offers a robust alternative to existing models for understanding decision-making under uncertainty.
  • This model provides a framework that aligns with both behavioral and neural data in various experimental contexts.
  • The findings advance our understanding of the interplay between sensory information processing and motor output generation.