Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision-making capacity and disaster research.

Donald L Rosenstein1

  • 1National Institute of Mental Health, Building 10, Room 3N 242, 10 Center Drive MSC 1277, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1277, USA. donaldrosenstein@nih.gov

Journal of Traumatic Stress
|January 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Navigating Dual Burdens: Financial Burdens and Travel Burdens Among Rural-Dwelling Cancer Survivors.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center·2026
Same author

Opportunities and Challenges for Addressing Financial Hardship as an Integrated Part of Cancer Care Delivery.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Implementation Challenges of a Multi-Center Financial Navigation Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis of Operational Process Data.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center·2026
Same author

Differences in Discrimination, Violence, Mental Health, and Substance Use Outcomes by Cancer History Among LGBTQ+ Individuals in North Carolina.

North Carolina medical journal·2026
Same author

"<i>How am I Going to Live? How am I Going to Pay Rent?"</i>: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Employment, Stigma, and Financial Hardship Among LGBTQ+ Cancer Caregivers.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center·2025
Same author

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Families Addressing Cancer Together for Parents With Cancer: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effects.

Psycho-oncology·2025
Same journal

Sex-specific associations between potentially traumatic events and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults.

Journal of traumatic stress·2026
Same journal

Trauma and posttraumatic stress among 2SLGBTQIA+ populations: Introduction to the special issue.

Journal of traumatic stress·2026
Same journal

Effects on intrusive memories of playing Tetris with or without simultaneous and deliberate memory recall.

Journal of traumatic stress·2026
Same journal

Pilot trial of THRIVE: A peer-delivered sexual and intimate partner violence prevention program for women in substance use treatment.

Journal of traumatic stress·2026
Same journal

Affective responses to positive events as a pathway linking posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms to risky behaviors among South Asian Americans.

Journal of traumatic stress·2026
Same journal

Psychological mediators of the associations between adverse and benevolent childhood experiences and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of traumatic stress·2026
See all related articles

Assessing decision-making capacity (DMC) in disaster survivors for research participation is crucial. This study offers a framework and safeguards for ethically including vulnerable populations in disaster research.

Area of Science:

  • Disaster research ethics
  • Clinical trial ethics
  • Vulnerable populations research

Background:

  • Assessing decision-making capacity (DMC) in disaster survivors for research participation is largely unexplored.
  • While trauma doesn't automatically impair autonomy, careful consideration of DMC is vital.
  • Vulnerable populations require enhanced protections in research settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a framework and procedural approach for assessing DMC in disaster-exposed individuals for research.
  • To highlight the importance of additional safeguards for participants with impaired DMC.
  • To offer recommendations for researchers, ethics boards, and policymakers.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a framework for assessing decision-making capacity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Procedural guidelines for evaluating research participants post-disaster.
  • Emphasis on implementing additional safeguards for vulnerable subjects.

    • Main Results:

    • A structured approach to assessing DMC in disaster research is proposed.
    • Guidelines for protecting individuals with impaired decision-making capacity are outlined.
    • Recommendations are provided for ethical research conduct in disaster contexts.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical research with disaster survivors necessitates robust assessment of decision-making capacity.
    • Implementing specific safeguards is essential to protect vulnerable participants.
    • Guidance is provided for the responsible design, review, and conduct of disaster research.