Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When is evidence sufficient?

Karl Claxton1, Joshua T Cohen, Peter J Neumann

  • 1University of York, United Kingdom.

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|January 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health costs of the UK-US trade deal on pharmaceuticals.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness thresholds used in the United States vs most favored nations.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Insights from Financial Economics to Value Healthcare Investments that Reduce System-Level Risks: Example of Disease Elimination and Eradication.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same author

Alternative Pricing Policies for Multi-Indication Products: A Quantitative Analysis.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same author

Communication of launch prices by drug companies, 2022-2024.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same author

Public Health.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same journal

National Health Expenditure Projections, 2025-34: Strong Utilization Growth Initially, Legislative Impacts Later.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

State Medicaid Programs Face Increased Spending On Medicare Premiums.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Not enough time.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Medicaid Tobacco And Nicotine Cessation Treatment Rates Remained Low, 2019-24.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Third-Party Convener Firms And The Rise Of Geographically Dispersed, High-Earning Medicare ACOs.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

The Opacity Of Price Transparency.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
See all related articles

Evidence-based medicine often relies on randomized controlled trials. Decision analysis offers a quantitative framework to integrate benefits and costs for intervention adoption, guiding research priorities through value-of-information analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Decision science
  • Evidence-based practice

Background:

  • Traditional evidence-based medicine heavily emphasizes randomized controlled trials for evaluating interventions.
  • Existing efforts to broaden evidence definitions often lack formal, quantitative links to intervention benefits and costs.
  • Intervention adoption decisions require a robust framework to integrate diverse evidence types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce decision analysis as a framework for quantitatively assessing intervention adoption based on evidence.
  • To highlight the role of value-of-information analysis in guiding research and evidence collection.
  • To bridge the gap between evidentiary criteria and the economic implications of healthcare decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing decision analysis to combine various information sources for intervention adoption decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying value-of-information analysis to determine the worth of additional research.
  • Developing quantitative methods to link evidentiary standards with cost-benefit assessments.

    • Main Results:

    • Decision analysis provides a structured approach to integrate evidence, costs, and benefits for intervention adoption.
    • Value-of-information analysis quantifies the potential benefit of further research, identifying optimal research strategies.
    • This framework allows for more informed and economically sound decisions regarding healthcare interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • Decision analysis offers a superior framework for evidence-based medicine by formally incorporating economic factors.
    • Value-of-information analysis is crucial for optimizing research investments and improving healthcare decision-making.
    • Integrating quantitative methods enhances the rigor and applicability of evidence-based practice.