Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using evidence reports: progress and challenges in evidence-based decision making.

Mark Helfand1

  • 1Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA. helfand@ohsu.edu

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|January 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Association Between Self-Reported Types of Toxic Exposures and Symptom Severity Among Gulf War Era Veterans.

Medical care·2025
Same author

Illness Experiences of Veterans Reporting Long-Term Symptoms or Health Challenges from COVID-19: Results from the VA COVID-19 Observational Research Collaboratory.

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same author

Synopsis of 2024 VA Long COVID Clinical Guidance for U.S. Veterans: Part 1, Nervous System-Related Symptoms.

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same author

When Decision Thresholds May Not Improve Decision Making.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

"They Make It So Hard on You": How Rurality Shapes Veterans' Health Experiences When Managing Gulf War Illness.

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same author

Learning to See Spin in Systematic Reviews.

Annals of internal medicine·2024
Same journal

National Health Expenditure Projections, 2025-34: Strong Utilization Growth Initially, Legislative Impacts Later.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

State Medicaid Programs Face Increased Spending On Medicare Premiums.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Not enough time.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Medicaid Tobacco And Nicotine Cessation Treatment Rates Remained Low, 2019-24.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Third-Party Convener Firms And The Rise Of Geographically Dispersed, High-Earning Medicare ACOs.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

The Opacity Of Price Transparency.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
See all related articles

Systematic evidence reviews enhance drug selection by focusing deliberations on key questions and reducing bias. Decision-makers must integrate evidence strength with other factors for transparent, value-based choices.

Area of Science:

  • Health policy
  • Clinical decision-making
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Systematic evidence reviews offer advantages for preferred drug deliberations.
  • Involving decision-makers in defining review scope focuses deliberations on clinically important questions.
  • Evidence reports define evidence limits and magnitude of differences between drugs.

Discussion:

  • Decision-makers must consider factors beyond evidence strength.
  • Values must be applied explicitly and defensibly in drug selection.
  • Systematic reviews help mitigate bias in decision-making processes.

Key Insights:

  • Systematic reviews improve the focus and reduce bias in drug deliberations.
  • Evidence reports clarify the comparative effectiveness and limitations of drug options.

Related Experiment Videos

  • GRADE is advancing methods for incorporating diverse considerations into evidence-based decisions.

    • Outlook:

    • Enhancing the integration of evidence strength with other decision factors is crucial.
    • Future efforts will focus on improving the transparency and defensibility of drug selection.
    • The GRADE Working Group aims to refine evidence-based decision-making frameworks.