Measuring the correlation between adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio (AN ratio) and tympanogram in children

Erol Egeli1, Fatih Oghan, Ozcan Ozturk

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Duzce Faculty of Medicine, University of Abant Izzet Baysal, AIBU, Duzce Tip Fakultesi KBB AD, 81620 Konuralp, Duzce, Turkey.

Insights

This study found that a higher adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio (AN ratio) in children correlates with eustachian tube dysfunction and lower middle ear pressure. While antibiotics reduce adenoid size, they may not fully restore middle ear function in cases of effusion.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Pediatric Audiology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Enlarged adenoids can cause nasal obstruction and eustachian tube dysfunction in children.
  • The adenoidal-nasopharyngeal (AN) ratio is a radiographic measure used to assess adenoid hypertrophy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between the AN ratio and tympanometric findings in children with symptoms of nasal obstruction.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of medical therapy on adenoid size and middle ear function.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study of 64 children (aged 6-9 years) with nasal symptoms.
  • Calculation of AN ratio from lateral neck radiographs and comparison with tympanometric values.
  • Statistical analysis using chi-square and Wilcoxon tests to assess correlations and treatment effects.

Main Results:

  • Children with AN ratios > 0.71 showed significantly lower middle ear pressures and a higher incidence of C-type tympanograms, indicating eustachian tube dysfunction.
  • Medical treatment significantly reduced adenoid size but did not lead to significant improvements in tympanometric values.
  • Middle ear effusions were associated with AN ratios > 0.71.

Conclusions:

  • A high AN ratio (> 0.71) is linked to eustachian tube dysfunction and middle ear issues in children.
  • Antibiotic therapy can reduce adenoid size, potentially improving eustachian tube function, but may be insufficient for persistent middle ear effusions.
  • Ventilation tube insertion is a viable alternative for middle ear effusions unresponsive to medical treatment.
Abstract