Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating peer support for prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Peer Support Inventory.

Suzanne K Steginga1, Carole Pinnock, Max Gardner

  • 1Community Services, Queensland Cancer Fund, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, Queensland 4004, Australia. ssteginga@qld.cancer.com.au

BJU International
|January 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Men attending prostate cancer support groups reported positive peer support, linked to better quality of life. Clinician support for group participation significantly impacted men's experience and outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Time from diagnosis to treatment: Are cancer patients who travel for treatment receiving optimal care in Australia?

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2025
Same author

Informing the development of a nurse-led survivorship intervention for men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy: A qualitative exploratory study.

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2025
Same author

Rural Cancer Survivors' Perceived Delays in Seeking Medical Attention, Diagnosis and Treatment: Findings From a Large Qualitative Study.

Cancer medicine·2025
Same author

Lessons from the implementation of the Australian 2016 prostate specific antigen testing clinical practice guidelines: a descriptive study.

ANZ journal of surgery·2025
Same author

Quantifying the Influence of Psychosocial Characteristics, Supportive Care Needs and Quality of Life on Breast Cancer Survival.

Psycho-oncology·2025
Same author

Acceptability of a nurse-led survivorship intervention for men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A qualitative exploratory study.

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2025

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Psychology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Prostate cancer significantly impacts men's quality of life.
  • Peer support groups offer a valuable resource for men navigating prostate cancer.
  • Assessing the effectiveness and characteristics of peer support is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate the Prostate Cancer Peer Support Inventory (PCSI).
  • To describe the socio-demographic, medical, and adjustment characteristics of Australian men in prostate cancer support groups.
  • To explore factors influencing men's satisfaction with peer support.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study involving 1224 Australian men from 44 prostate cancer support groups.
  • Self-report measures included the PCSI, quality of life (QoL) scales, psychological distress, and perceived clinician support.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data analysis considered individual and group-level variables.

    • Main Results:

    • Most men rated peer support positively; high satisfaction correlated with better QoL and lower pain.
    • Dissatisfaction was linked to higher psychological distress and lower perceived clinician support.
    • Sexual bother was the most common physical symptom (74% reporting moderate/high bother).

    Conclusions:

    • The PCSI is a validated tool for assessing peer support in prostate cancer.
    • Individual perceptions of peer support benefits were significant, not group-level differences.
    • Clinician attitudes towards support group participation influence patient experience, highlighting implications for service development.