Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Ex Vivo Infection of Human Lymphoid Tissue and Female Genital Mucosa with Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 and Histoculture
Published on: October 12, 2018
Human immunodeficiency virus infection in trauma patients: where do we stand?
Stanislaw P Stawicki1, William S Hoff, Brian A Hoey
1Department of Surgery, St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 18015, USA. s0staw01@hotmail.com
Objective:
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic is a growing health care problem. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between HIV infection and trauma patient treatment, complications, and mortality.
Methods:
The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database was used to identify trauma patients with known HIV-positive status (HP) and randomly selected age-matched controls (CL). Demographics, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, mechanism of injury, preexisting conditions, complications, mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ILOS), and operative interventions were compared.
Results:
Demographics, vital signs on presentation, and Injury Severity Score were similar between the HP and CL groups. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups (3.6% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.6447). HP patients were more likely to present with penetrating injuries (22.6% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.0031) and had significantly fewer major orthopedic injuries than CL patients (p < 0.01). HP patients were more likely to have a history of a neurologic condition; chronic drug/alcohol use; psychiatric diagnosis; or liver, pulmonary, and/or renal disease (all p < 0.01). HP patients had more pulmonary complications (12.3% vs. 4.1%), renal complications, and infectious/septic complications (all p < 0.01) than controls. Infection/sepsis and pulmonary complications were associated with significant mortality in HP patients. HP patients underwent more thoracostomies (7.5% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.0235) and exploratory laparotomies (7.0% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.0002). HLOS (10.2 +/- 10 vs. 6.8 +/- 8.6 days, p = 0.001) and ILOS (2.3 +/- 7.2 vs. 1.5 +/- 4.9 days, p = 0.0178) were greater for HP patients. HP patients were less likely than controls to be discharged directly to home (67.8% vs. 82.7%, p = 0.0001).
Conclusion:
HP patients had more preexisting conditions and complications than controls. There was no difference in overall mortality between the two groups. However, pulmonary/infectious complications were associated with significant mortality in HP patients. HP patients consumed more health care resources than controls, as exemplified by greater ILOS and HLOS and more operative procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency disorders...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...

