Related Experiment Videos
Can pilots time-share better than non-pilots?
1Research Associate, Aviation Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Savoy, IL 61874, USA.
Applied Ergonomics
|December 1, 1986
Summary
Pilots and students showed similar time-sharing abilities. Task interference increased with structural similarity, supporting the multiple resources theory and suggesting training cannot easily alter this structure dependency.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Factors Engineering
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- Time-sharing, or multitasking, is crucial in many operational environments.
- Understanding the factors influencing time-sharing efficiency is vital for performance optimization.
- The multiple resources theory proposes distinct cognitive resources for different task types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the time-sharing performance of pilots and college students.
- To investigate the impact of structural task similarity on dual-task interference.
- To evaluate the generalizability of laboratory findings to operational settings.
Main Methods:
- A secondary task paradigm was employed.
- Participants (pilots and students) performed five dual tasks.
- Task pairs varied in their degree of structural similarity.
Main Results:
- Greater task interference occurred with more structurally similar dual tasks.
- Pilots showed a slight advantage in one specific dual-task condition.
- No compelling evidence indicated a general superiority in time-sharing for pilots over students.
Conclusions:
- Time-sharing performance is significantly influenced by task structure.
- Training does not appear to substantially alter the structure-dependent nature of time-sharing.
- Laboratory findings on structural determinants of time-sharing are applicable to real-world operational environments.