Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Routine use of mental health outcome assessments: choosing the measure
Giovanni Salvi1, Morven Leese, Mike Slade
1Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. giovanni.salvi@medicina.univr.it
Background:
There is little consensus about which outcome measures to use in mental healthcare.
Aims:
To investigate the relationship between the items in four staff-rated measures recommended for routine use.
Method:
Correlation analysis of total scores and factor analysis using combined data from the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS), the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) were performed. Procrustes analysis on factors and scales, and Ward's cluster analysis to group the items, were applied.
Results:
The total scores of the measures were moderately correlated. The Procrustes analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis all agreed on better coverage of the patients' problems by HoNOS and CANSAS.
Conclusions:
A global severity factor accounts for 16% of the variance, and is best measured with TAG or GAF. The CANSAS and HoNOS each provide a detailed characterisation of the patient; only CANSAS provides information about met needs.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments and...
