Fractionating working memory: consolidation and maintenance are independent processes
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Geoffrey F Woodman1, Edward K Vogel
1Department of Psychology, Wilson Hall, 111 21st Ave. South, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240-1103, USA. geoffrey.f.woodman@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract:
In the present study, we required subjects to remember simple objects that were masked to interrupt consolidation and allow us to estimate the rate of information accrual in visual working memory. We compared a consolidation-baseline condition with a consolidation-during-maintenance condition in which subjects needed to remember a set of unmasked items and then were shown to-be-remembered masked items. We hypothesized that if the control processes of consolidation and maintenance are performed by common mechanisms, then consolidation should be less efficient when performed during maintenance than when performed alone. However, we found that an identical amount of information was encoded per unit time in the two conditions. These results indicate that working memory consolidation is not slowed by maintenance and suggest a two-step model of encoding in visual working memory.
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Role of Hippocampus in Memory
Chunking
The principle behind chunking is...
Understanding Memory

