Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, 900 S. Limestone Street, 326 Wethington Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0200, USA. mukherjee@uky.edu
Insights
Diabetic patients often have poorer outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or angioplasty. Further research is needed to determine if new therapies improve outcomes to be comparable or better than CABG.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diabetic Complications
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Revascularization outcomes in diabetic patients are generally less favorable compared to non-diabetic individuals.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and angioplasty are common revascularization strategies with varying results in diabetic populations.
- The BARI 2D trial is investigating the optimal treatment strategy for diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the value of early intervention in diabetic patients undergoing revascularization.
- To determine if advancements in medical therapy, such as GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and dual antiplatelet therapy, can improve outcomes for diabetic patients treated with stenting (including drug-eluting stents).
- To compare the effectiveness of different revascularization strategies in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease.
Main Methods:
- The abstract discusses ongoing trials like BARI 2D, which are designed to evaluate treatment strategies.
- It highlights the consideration of specific interventions like coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting for severe disease.
- It also mentions the selection of angioplasty for patients with less severe, discrete coronary artery disease.
Main Results:
- Current revascularization strategies (CABG or angioplasty) are associated with less favorable outcomes in diabetic patients.
- The impact of newer pharmacologic therapies and prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy on stent outcomes in diabetics is still under investigation.
- Fig. 3 is referenced, suggesting data exists to support the discussion, though specific results are not detailed in the abstract.
Conclusions:
- For diabetic patients with severe multi-vessel coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with LIMA grafting appears to be a prudent consideration.
- Angioplasty may be a suitable option for selected diabetic patients with less severe and more discrete coronary artery disease.
- Further research is needed to ascertain if modern antiplatelet therapies and stenting techniques can yield outcomes comparable or superior to CABG in this patient group.
Abstract:
Revascularization with CABG or angioplasty in diabetic patients is associated with a less favor-able outcome. The value of early intervention will be assessed in the ongoing BARI 2D trial. It remains to be determined whether the widespread use of GP IIb/IIIa drugs and prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy in diabetic patients who receive stents, and possibly drug-eluting stents, will alter results significantly so that outcomes become comparable or even better than CABG (Fig. 3). It seems prudent to consider CABG with LIMA grafting in diabetic patients who have severe multi-vessel disease and to consider angioplasty in selected patients who have more discrete and less severe disease.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Complications of Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Nephropathy

