Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The "over-exposed" control group.

E L Wynder1, S D Stellman

  • 1American Health Foundation, New York, NY.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

To detect health effects, studies need diverse exposure levels. For dietary fat and cancer research, selecting populations with varied fat intake is crucial for accurate relative risk assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smoking and lung cancer risk in American and Japanese men: an international case-control study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2001
Same author

Cancer mortality in the United States and Germany.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2001
Same author

Reevaluation of the confounding effect of cigarette smoking on the relationship between alcohol use and lung cancer risk, with larynx cancer used as a positive control.

Preventive medicine·2001
Same author

Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer.

JAMA·2000
Same author

Oral enzyme therapy and experimental rat mammary tumor metastasis.

Life sciences·2000
Same author

In search of hypotheses.

Nutrition and cancer·1999

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Nutritional Science
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Relative risk estimation depends on exposure levels in both cases and controls.
  • Narrow exposure ranges in study populations limit the detection of health effects.
  • Inconsistent observations of dietary fat and cancer associations may stem from limited exposure variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of exposure variability in epidemiological studies.
  • To explain challenges in detecting associations between dietary fat and cancer.
  • To recommend selecting study populations with a wide distribution of risk factors.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of exposure distribution in case-control studies.
  • Evaluation of relative risk determination based on exposure ranges.
  • Review of factors influencing the observation of dietary fat-cancer links.

Main Results:

  • Studies with narrow exposure ranges yield limited information on health effects.
  • Limited variation in dietary fat intake in populations like the US restricts the detection of moderate relative risks.
  • Significant relative risks are more detectable when exposure varies widely.

Conclusions:

  • Epidemiological studies require populations with diverse exposure levels for robust findings.
  • Investigating the dietary fat-cancer hypothesis necessitates studying populations with a broad spectrum of fat consumption.
  • Narrowly distributed risk factors can obscure true associations, impacting public health research.

Related Experiment Videos